https://progressiveindiana.net
SUMMARY:
The night after the May 5, 2026 Indiana primary, Rev. Tony Alexander and Pastor David W. Greene Sr. take stock of what the results mean for Indiana Democrats heading into November. Pastor Greene, himself a Senate candidate in the primary, reflects candidly on the experience of running a campaign before the conversation turns to the structural problem at the heart of Indiana Democratic politics: a Marion County electorate that turns out at 15% in primaries and needs to hit 45% or better to elect anyone statewide. The hosts walk through the numbers on voter turnout, the Secretary of State race, the Bayh name recognition question, Trump’s $13.5 million primary purge of redistricting dissenters, and what all of it means for down-ballot candidates like Kerry Forestal and Christina Moorhead. Listener comments from Gloria, Victor, Jill, Joseph, and caller Guy round out the discussion with on-the-ground perspective.
WHAT’S INSIDE
00:00:00 — Opening and Replay Reminder
- Rev. Alexander opens by reminding listeners they can catch the full show replay on the Progressive Indiana Network’s Substack the following morning.
- He notes the Indiana primaries are effectively over, with only provisional and military ballots still pending.
- He welcomes Pastor David W. Greene Sr. and sets up the evening’s focus: what happened in the primary and what work remains before November.
- Pastor Greene opens in prayer for the listening and watching audience.
00:01:40 — Pastor Greene on Running for Senate
- Rev. Alexander asks Pastor Greene — who ran for Senate in the primary — to share what the experience is like from a candidate’s perspective.
- Pastor Greene reflects that running a campaign is a relentless grind: canvassing, responding to requests, preparing materials, and managing volunteers, all while still having to live your regular life.
- He describes the emotional roller coaster — some days energized, some days drained — and says he was simply relieved when Election Day finally arrived.
- He frames the outcome plainly: “nothing beats a failure but a try,” and says running taught him a great deal about himself, other people, and how the political machine actually operates.
00:05:38 — Volunteers vs. Voters: The Primary Turnout Problem
- Rev. Alexander notes there was unusual volunteer energy for a primary, with lots of people standing behind candidates — but that enthusiasm didn’t translate into actual votes.
- Pastor Greene explains the core disconnect: most people don’t understand that the primary determines who’s on the November ballot, not November itself.
- He uses Senate District 29 as an example: roughly 10,000 people voted across all candidates in the primary, but winning in November will require 25,000 votes at minimum — and possibly close to 60,000 if participation trends continue upward.
- The lesson: a small minority of voters determines the primary, while the overwhelming majority only shows up in November.
00:07:56 — Marion County by the Numbers
- Rev. Alexander puts Marion County’s turnout in concrete terms: 632,000 registered voters, just over 15% participation in the primary — an improvement over past cycles, but still dismal.
- He walks through the math: every additional 15 points of turnout doubles the effective voting pool, yet Marion County is still well below 50%.
- Listener Gloria comments on Facebook that many people she encountered didn’t even understand what the primary was or what its purpose is.
- Pastor Greene agrees, noting some residents saw campaign signs and assumed they were for November — they didn’t know a May election was happening at all.
00:09:27 — Why Turnout Is the Only Variable That Matters
- Pastor Greene says he has no magic solution to the turnout problem, but points to contested races and national/state conditions as the drivers of the modest increase they did see.
- He argues statewide candidates cannot win without Marion County turning out at 45% or better — a candidate can visit every county in Indiana and still lose if Marion Democrats stay home.
- He uses Secretary of State Diego Morales as the cautionary case: Republicans were embarrassed by him and barely put him in public, yet he won because Marion County turnout was too low to overcome rural Republican numbers.
- His bottom line: 15% primary turnout means 85% of Marion County Democrats didn’t participate — and that gap is what has consistently cost Democrats statewide races.
00:13:13 — Listener Feedback: The Voter Education Gap
- Listener Gloria’s comment surfaces a deeper problem: voters who don’t know the difference between a primary and a general election, or an off-year and a presidential-year election.
- Rev. Alexander says this is something you encounter constantly when canvassing — it’s not just apathy, it’s genuine lack of civic knowledge.
- Pastor Greene agrees and says the work ahead isn’t just get-out-the-vote but voter education and preparation at a basic level.
- Listener Victor comments that Democrats show up strong for the state convention but tank in November — Rev. Alexander says he’s heard this before, particularly the assumption that local Democrats don’t need to vote because their candidate is already safe.
00:15:32 — Post-Primary Division: Will Democrats Unify?
- Pastor Greene raises the unity problem directly: before the election, he saw social media posts where people were asked whether they’d support the primary winner — and a lot of responses were “maybe” or “it all depends.”
- He argues that failure to heal the primary divide will make it impossible to win in November, because you’re not winning anything with 15% turnout.
- Statewide candidates need to not just win Marion County but win it by enough of a margin to overcome the rural Republican advantage — simply “getting” Marion County isn’t enough.
- He uses SD-29 nominee Christina Moorhead as an example: she needs strong Democratic turnout specifically in the Pike and Wayne portions of Marion County, or she cannot win.
00:17:40 — Caller Guy: Reasons for Optimism
- Caller Guy agrees with the hosts’ overall framing but argues 2026 will be different: Beau Bayh — Evan Bayh’s son — is presumed to be the Democratic nominee for Secretary of State after the June convention, and Guy believes the Bayh name will drive turnout among longtime Democrats and independents.
- Guy also points to growing voter disenchantment with Trump’s economic record — gas prices, food prices, farm input costs — as a potential crossover motivator even among some Republicans.
- He flags the massive Trump-aligned spending in the Indiana Republican primary as a signal of what’s at stake and notes that money was the mother’s milk of those one-issue anti-redistricting ads.
- Rev. Alexander thanks Guy and flags that he’ll address the optimism — and the money — after the break.
00:21:51 — Back from Break: The $13.5 Million Primary Purge
- Rev. Alexander reframes Guy’s optimism: the same forces that just spent $13.5 million — up from $250,000 last cycle, a 5,000% increase — to primary redistricting dissenters will not sit out November.
- He argues Democrats cannot afford to run on the cheap and need real resources to support candidates, not assume passion alone carries the race.
- Pastor Greene calls the spending a naked power play by private backers expecting a return on investment — not party money, but donors who want something specific in exchange.
- Both hosts agree it sent a clear message to every Republican officeholder: cross Trump and you’re gone.
00:29:35 — What That Money Is Really Buying
- Pastor Greene connects the primary purge directly to the 2027 redistricting cycle: the newly installed MAGA senators in rural districts are safe from Democratic challenge and will vote accordingly when the map comes up again.
- He argues Trump funded these candidates specifically because redistricting was coming — the investment was never just about 2026, it was about locking in the 2027 vote.
- Listener Gloria comments that campaign finance used to have rules and regulations — Rev. Alexander agrees and says the current environment is the wild, wild west.
- Pastor Greene closes the thought: when someone spends that kind of money, they are committed to winning, and that money will be back in November.
00:32:48 — Candidate Visibility and the DNC Investment Question
- Listener Jill raises two issues: candidates need to do more retail politics to introduce themselves to voters, and the national Democratic Party isn’t investing enough at the local level.
- Rev. Alexander partially agrees but notes this primary season featured more candidate forums than he’s seen before — the problem wasn’t opportunity, it was whether voters showed up.
- He also pushes back on the DNC framing: the $13.5 million in Republican ads didn’t come from the party — it came from individual donors making phone calls, and Democrats need to think the same way.
- The Republican ads were simple one-issue attacks — “this person voted against redistricting, against Donald Trump” — effective precisely because they were that blunt.
00:36:18 — The Bayh Name Recognition Problem
- Rev. Alexander raises a skepticism about the Bayh name that goes further than Guy’s optimism: voters who remember Birch and Evan are aging out, and younger voters and newer Indiana residents have no idea who the Bayhs are.
- Pastor Greene fully agrees: the people who know the Bayh name are 40-plus; 20- and 30-year-olds don’t know the family at all, because it’s been over 20 years since Evan Bayh held office.
- He warns that assuming name recognition will carry Beau Bayh is a miscalculation — he has to run a real campaign in Marion County, answering the basic voter questions: who is he, what will he do, why should I vote for him.
- They both point to Evan Bayh’s own last race as a cautionary tale: a household name who lost because Marion County didn’t turn out at the level he needed.
00:39:33 — Healing the Primary Divide
- Rev. Alexander frames the post-primary moment starkly: in this environment, the choice is MAGA or Democrat — there is no third lane — and any further Democratic fracturing is a direct gift to Republicans.
- He says it doesn’t matter which candidate you supported in the primary; the entire party is now the concern, and unity is non-negotiable.
- Pastor Greene puts it on party leadership: what happens over the summer — the conversations, the planning, the direction-setting — will determine whether Indiana Democrats can capitalize on a potentially favorable national environment.
- He contrasts MAGA’s structural advantage — one leader, one message, unified turnout — with the Democratic reality of multiple leaders who must coordinate deliberately rather than following a single signal.
00:42:58 — Know Your Candidates: Voter Research and Campaign Finance
- Listener Joseph comments that voters need to verify and trust — do the homework, know the candidates before November.
- Rev. Alexander expands on this: for statewide races especially, if you can’t meet the candidate in person, look up their record — how they voted, what they supported, what they said they’d take away.
- He argues the campaign finance picture is part of that research: when $13.5 million floods into a primary, people should be asking right then where it came from, not just reporting the number.
- Pastor Greene agrees: anyone spending that kind of money is expecting a return on investment, and voters deserve to know what that return is.
00:45:05 — Trump’s Loyalty Demand and the Long Game on Redistricting
- Pastor Greene lays out the long-term implication: the Trump-backed candidates who won their rural primaries are essentially in office now — Democrats aren’t beating them in November.
- Those five or more new MAGA legislators will be in place for the 2027 redistricting vote, which is exactly what the spending was designed to achieve.
- Rev. Alexander adds that Trump has said out loud that judges he appoints should be loyal to him — nobody should be surprised that legislators he funds are equally beholden.
- Pastor Greene notes Indiana Senate leadership itself could shift as a result, since the new members tip the internal balance further toward the MAGA faction.
00:47:35 — Door-Knocking vs. Social Media: What Actually Works?
- Listener Jill advocates for candidates going old school — events, door-knocking, direct voter contact — and Rev. Alexander asks Pastor Greene to weigh in from his own primary experience.
- Pastor Greene says door-knocking has a 10% hit rate at best: safety concerns, ring doorbells, and general reluctance mean only one in ten people will actually open the door.
- He says you still have to do it — leaving material and showing you were there matters — but the kitchen-table conversation of the old days is largely gone.
- The answer isn’t one silver bullet: you need events, door-knocking, social media, texts, emails, and mailers all at once, and you just hope enough of it lands.
00:50:30 — Closing: Make Your Plan to Vote Now
- Rev. Alexander thanks Pastor Greene for his efforts during the primary season and acknowledges there is still a lot of work ahead.
- He closes with the same message the show started the year with: don’t wait until November — make your plan to vote now.
- He reminds listeners the show replay will be available on the Progressive Indiana Network’s Substack the following morning.
- Pastor Greene and Rev. Alexander sign off and wish the audience a blessed week.
https://www.facebook.com/ClergyIndyhttps://www.facebook.com/ClergyIndy
